Steady Matcha
500 Tins · Ships Sep 2026

Bryan Johnson Blueprint vs GMA Matcha: 2026 Comparison

This 2026 comparison covers Bryan Johnson Blueprint and GMA across price, testing transparency, heavy metal disclosure, and organic certification. Bryan Johnson Blueprint publishes a numeric Certificate of Analysis with specific ppb values from a named lab. GMA has not published equivalent numeric results as of the last verification date. On price, GMA is $0.74/g less expensive per gram ($1.10/g vs $0.36/g).

VerdictSpec tableHeavy metalsPriceFAQ

Verdict by Axis

No single overall winner is declared. The better choice depends on which axis matters most to you.

Price per gram

GMA

GMA is $0.74/g cheaper ($1.10/g vs $0.36/g).

Testing transparency

Bryan Johnson Blueprint

Bryan Johnson Blueprint is Tier 1 vs Unrated for GMA. Lower tier number means more disclosure.

Published lead level

Tie / indeterminate

Bryan Johnson Blueprint publishes a lead value (98 ppb). GMA has not published a numeric lead value. Cannot compare directly.

Origin

Tie / indeterminate

One or both brands have not publicly disclosed their leaf origin region.

Organic certification

Tie / indeterminate

Neither brand has a publicly confirmed organic certification.

Side-by-Side Spec Table

FieldBryan Johnson BlueprintGMA
OriginNot disclosedNot disclosed
GradeCeremonialNot specified
Price per gram$1.10/g$0.36/gBetter
Transparency tierTier 1--
Publishes numeric COAYesBetterNo
Third-party testedYesBetterNo
Organic certificationNoneNone
Lead (published)98 ppbNot publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)
Cadmium (published)17 ppbNot publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)
Arsenic (published)18 ppbNot publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)
Mercury (published)4 ppbNot publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)
Pesticide testedNoNo
Last verifiedJune 21, 2026June 27, 2026
Bryan Johnson Blueprint
GMA

Origin

Not disclosed
Not disclosed

Grade

Ceremonial
Not specified

Price per gram

$1.10/g
$0.36/g

Transparency tier

Tier 1
--

Publishes numeric COA

Yes
No

Third-party tested

Yes
No

Organic certification

None
None

Lead (published)

98 ppb
Not publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)

Cadmium (published)

17 ppb
Not publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)

Arsenic (published)

18 ppb
Not publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)

Mercury (published)

4 ppb
Not publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)

Pesticide tested

No
No

Last verified

June 21, 2026
June 27, 2026

Heavy Metals and Safety Disclosure

Bryan Johnson Blueprint reports a lead level of 98 ppb (verified June 21, 2026). GMA has not published a numeric lead value (checked June 27, 2026). Without a published value from GMA, a direct comparison is not possible. The absence of published data does not indicate safety or danger.

MetalBryan Johnson BlueprintGMA
Lead98 ppbNot publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)
Cadmium17 ppbNot publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)
Arsenic18 ppbNot publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)
Mercury4 ppbNot publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)

Source: brand-published COAs and independent test results. Values are from specific batches and dates. Absence of published data does not indicate safety or danger. Last verified: Bryan Johnson Blueprint June 21, 2026, GMA June 27, 2026.

Price Comparison

GMA is $0.74/g cheaper than Bryan Johnson Blueprint ($0.36/g vs $1.10/g, a 67% difference). At 30 servings per month, that is approximately $44/month in savings.

Detailed Analysis

Testing Transparency

Bryan Johnson Blueprint publishes a numeric COA with specific ppb values from a named accredited lab. GMA has not published equivalent numeric results. No public testing statement has been found for GMA as of the last verification date.

Origin and Sourcing

Neither brand has publicly disclosed a specific leaf origin region. Origin cannot be compared without this information.

Which Should You Buy?

If testing transparency is your priority: Bryan Johnson Blueprint (Tier 1) discloses more than GMA (Unrated). If price per gram is your priority: GMA is the more affordable option at $0.36/g.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bryan Johnson Blueprint or GMA cheaper?

GMA is cheaper at $0.36/g vs $1.10/g per gram, a difference of $0.74/g. Prices verified as of 2026-06-27.

Does Bryan Johnson Blueprint publish lab results?

Yes. Bryan Johnson Blueprint publishes a numeric Certificate of Analysis with specific ppb values from a named accredited lab. Verified June 21, 2026.

Does GMA publish lab results?

No public testing statement or COA has been found for GMA as of June 27, 2026.

Which is third-party tested: Bryan Johnson Blueprint or GMA?

Bryan Johnson Blueprint is third-party tested. GMA does not have a confirmed third-party testing status as of the last verification date.

Bryan Johnson Blueprint full profileGMA full profileBryan Johnson Blueprint alternativesGMA alternativesAll brandsAll comparisons

Related comparisons

Bryan Johnson Blueprint vs EnchaBryan Johnson Blueprint vs IppodoGMA vs Jade LeafGMA vs Midori Spring
Brands with published COAMost transparent brandsBrands by originSteady batch COA

All data in this comparison is sourced from publicly available COAs, brand websites, and independent test results. Every safety data point carries its source and last-verified date. Steady Matcha does not conduct or claim ownership of third-party test results for other brands. Brand information changes: verify current status before purchasing.