Good & Gather vs Ippodo Tea
This 2026 comparison covers Good & Gather and Ippodo Tea across price, testing transparency, heavy metal disclosure, and organic certification. On price, Good & Gather is $1.95/g less expensive per gram ($0.10/g vs $2.05/g).
At a Glance
Good & Gather
- Origin
- Not disclosed
- Grade
- Not specified
- Price per gram
- $0.10/g
- Organic
- Not certified
- Testing
- No public testing information found
- Last verified
- June 27, 2026
Ippodo Tea
- Origin
- Uji, Japan
- Grade
- Ceremonial
- Price per gram
- $2.05/g
- Organic
- Not certified
- Testing
- Claims testing, no published results
- Last verified
- June 27, 2026
Key Differences
Price per gram
Better valueGood & Gather
$0.10/g
Ippodo Tea
$2.05/g
Good & Gather is $1.95/g less per gram (95% difference).
Origin
Not enough informationGood & Gather
Not disclosed
Ippodo Tea
Uji, Japan
Ippodo Tea discloses its origin. The other brand has not publicly disclosed its leaf origin.
Testing transparency
More transparentGood & Gather
No public testing information found
Ippodo Tea
Claims testing, no published results
Ippodo Tea discloses more testing information. Lower transparency tier means more public disclosure.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Good & Gather if:
- You want the lower price per gram
Choose Ippodo Tea if:
- Testing transparency is important to you
Heavy Metal Testing
Good & Gather
No published numeric heavy metal results found.
Last checked June 27, 2026.
Ippodo Tea
No published numeric heavy metal results found.
Last checked June 27, 2026.
Source: brand-published COAs and independent test results. Values are from specific batches and dates. The absence of published data does not indicate safety or danger. Last verified: Good & Gather June 27, 2026, Ippodo Tea June 27, 2026.
Full Comparison
| Attribute | Good & Gather | Ippodo Tea |
|---|---|---|
| Origin and Production | ||
Origin | -- | Uji, Japan |
Grade | -- | Ceremonial |
Country | -- | Japan |
Region | -- | Uji |
| Price and Value | ||
Price per gram? | $0.10/g | $2.05/g |
Price as of | 2026-06-27 | 2026-06-27 |
| Testing and Transparency | ||
Testing transparency | -- | Claims testing, no published results |
Publishes numeric lab results | -- | -- |
Third-party testing disclosed | -- | -- |
Pesticide testing | -- | -- |
Published lead test result | No published results found (checked June 27, 2026) | No published results found (checked June 27, 2026) |
Published cadmium test result | No published results found (checked June 27, 2026) | No published results found (checked June 27, 2026) |
Published arsenic test result | No published results found (checked June 27, 2026) | No published results found (checked June 27, 2026) |
Published mercury test result | No published results found (checked June 27, 2026) | No published results found (checked June 27, 2026) |
Last verified | June 27, 2026 | June 27, 2026 |
1 field with no available data are hidden.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related comparisons
All data in this comparison is sourced from publicly available COAs, brand websites, and independent test results. Every safety data point carries its source and last-verified date. Steady Matcha does not conduct or claim ownership of third-party test results for other brands. Brand information changes: verify current status before purchasing.