Steady Matcha
500 Tins · Ships Sep 2026

Maeda-en vs Milia Matcha Matcha: 2026 Comparison

This 2026 comparison covers Maeda-en and Milia Matcha across price, testing transparency, heavy metal disclosure, and organic certification. Milia Matcha publishes a numeric Certificate of Analysis with specific ppb values from a named lab. Maeda-en has not published equivalent numeric results as of the last verification date. On price, Maeda-en is $0.10/g less expensive per gram ($0.70/g vs $0.80/g).

VerdictSpec tableHeavy metalsPriceFAQ

Verdict by Axis

No single overall winner is declared. The better choice depends on which axis matters most to you.

Price per gram

Maeda-en

Maeda-en is $0.10/g cheaper ($0.70/g vs $0.80/g).

Testing transparency

Milia Matcha

Milia Matcha is Tier 1 vs Unrated for Maeda-en. Lower tier number means more disclosure.

Published lead level

Tie / indeterminate

Milia Matcha publishes a lead value (95 ppb). Maeda-en has not published a numeric lead value. Cannot compare directly.

Origin

Tie / indeterminate

One or both brands have not publicly disclosed their leaf origin region.

Organic certification

Maeda-en

Maeda-en holds ORGANIC certification. Milia Matcha does not have a publicly confirmed organic certification.

Side-by-Side Spec Table

FieldMaeda-enMilia Matcha
OriginNot disclosedJapan
GradeCeremonialNot specified
Price per gram$0.70/gBetter$0.80/g
Transparency tier--Tier 1
Publishes numeric COANoYesBetter
Third-party testedNoYesBetter
Organic certificationORGANICNone
Lead (published)Not publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)95 ppb
Cadmium (published)Not publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)Not publicly published (checked June 21, 2026)
Arsenic (published)Not publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)Not publicly published (checked June 21, 2026)
Mercury (published)Not publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)Not publicly published (checked June 21, 2026)
Pesticide testedNoNo
Last verifiedJune 27, 2026June 21, 2026
Maeda-en
Milia Matcha

Origin

Not disclosed
Japan

Grade

Ceremonial
Not specified

Price per gram

$0.70/g
$0.80/g

Transparency tier

--
Tier 1

Publishes numeric COA

No
Yes

Third-party tested

No
Yes

Organic certification

ORGANIC
None

Lead (published)

Not publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)
95 ppb

Cadmium (published)

Not publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)
Not publicly published (checked June 21, 2026)

Arsenic (published)

Not publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)
Not publicly published (checked June 21, 2026)

Mercury (published)

Not publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)
Not publicly published (checked June 21, 2026)

Pesticide tested

No
No

Last verified

June 27, 2026
June 21, 2026

Heavy Metals and Safety Disclosure

Milia Matcha reports a lead level of 95 ppb (verified June 21, 2026). Maeda-en has not published a numeric lead value (checked June 27, 2026). Without a published value from Maeda-en, a direct comparison is not possible. The absence of published data does not indicate safety or danger.

MetalMaeda-enMilia Matcha
LeadNot publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)95 ppb
CadmiumNot publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)Not publicly published (checked June 21, 2026)
ArsenicNot publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)Not publicly published (checked June 21, 2026)
MercuryNot publicly published (checked June 27, 2026)Not publicly published (checked June 21, 2026)

Source: brand-published COAs and independent test results. Values are from specific batches and dates. Absence of published data does not indicate safety or danger. Last verified: Maeda-en June 27, 2026, Milia Matcha June 21, 2026.

Price Comparison

Maeda-en is $0.10/g cheaper than Milia Matcha ($0.70/g vs $0.80/g, a 13% difference). At 30 servings per month, that is approximately $6/month in savings.

Detailed Analysis

Testing Transparency

Milia Matcha publishes a numeric COA with specific ppb values from a named accredited lab. Maeda-en has not published equivalent numeric results. No public testing statement has been found for Maeda-en as of the last verification date.

Origin and Sourcing

Milia Matcha sources from Japan. Maeda-en has not publicly disclosed a specific leaf origin region. Origin cannot be fully compared.

Which Should You Buy?

If testing transparency is your priority: Milia Matcha (Tier 1) discloses more than Maeda-en (Unrated). If price per gram is your priority: Maeda-en is the more affordable option at $0.70/g. If organic certification matters to you: Maeda-en holds ORGANIC certification. Milia Matcha does not have a publicly confirmed organic certification.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Maeda-en or Milia Matcha cheaper?

Maeda-en is cheaper at $0.70/g vs $0.80/g per gram, a difference of $0.10/g. Prices verified as of 2026-06-27.

Does Maeda-en publish lab results?

No public testing statement or COA has been found for Maeda-en as of June 27, 2026.

Does Milia Matcha publish lab results?

Yes. Milia Matcha publishes a numeric Certificate of Analysis with specific ppb values from a named accredited lab. Verified June 21, 2026.

Which is third-party tested: Maeda-en or Milia Matcha?

Milia Matcha is third-party tested. Maeda-en does not have a confirmed third-party testing status as of the last verification date.

Is Maeda-en or Milia Matcha organic?

Maeda-en holds ORGANIC certification. Milia Matcha does not have a publicly confirmed organic certification as of the last verification date.

Maeda-en full profileMilia Matcha full profileMaeda-en alternativesMilia Matcha alternativesAll brandsAll comparisons

Related comparisons

Maeda-en vs EnchaMaeda-en vs IppodoMilia Matcha vs Jade LeafMilia Matcha vs Midori Spring
Brands with published COAMost transparent brandsBrands by originSteady batch COA

All data in this comparison is sourced from publicly available COAs, brand websites, and independent test results. Every safety data point carries its source and last-verified date. Steady Matcha does not conduct or claim ownership of third-party test results for other brands. Brand information changes: verify current status before purchasing.