Matcha Brands with Public Lab Results
Matcha brands that publish numeric lab results publicly — accessible without requesting or purchasing.
Quick Answer
Why these brands qualify
Each brand makes their lab results publicly accessible on their website without requiring a purchase, account creation, or direct request. Public accessibility is verified at the time of last verification.
Useful for
Researchers, journalists, safety advocates, and buyers who want to verify lab results before purchasing without any friction or brand interaction.
Strongest in collection
Teafy — Publishes numeric COA (ppb resolution, named lab, dated)
Collection Overview
Aggregate data across all 4 brands in this collection.
4
Brands in collection
4 of 4
With published COA
4 of 4
With numeric ppb testing
1 of 4
Organic certified
Tier 1.0
Avg transparency tier
$0.81/g
Avg price per gram
Key Takeaways
- 1Public lab results are accessible to anyone without purchasing, requesting, or contacting the brand.
- 2Public accessibility is a meaningful transparency signal — it enables independent verification.
- 3Numeric values are required — summary statements like 'passed testing' cannot be independently verified.
- 4COA dates matter — results from years ago may not reflect current product batches.
- 5Brands that share COAs only on request are not included in this collection.
Featured Brands
Strongest brands in this collection based on transparency and disclosure practices.
Kyoto Uji + Shizuoka, Japan · ceremonial grade
Publishes numeric COA (ppb resolution, named lab, dated)
Japan · ceremonial grade
Publishes numeric COA (ppb resolution, named lab, dated)
Japan · ceremonial grade
Publishes numeric COA (ppb resolution, named lab, dated)
Full Comparison Table
All 4 brands in this collection. Click column headers to sort.
| Brand ↕ | Transparency ↑ | Origin ↕ | COA Status | Heavy Metals | Organic | Price/g ↕ | Verified ↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan Johnson Blueprint | Tier 1 | Japan | Published (ppb) | Tested (ppb) | Unspecified | $1.10/gas of 2026-06 | 2026-06-21 | Details → |
| Matcha Nude | Tier 1 | Japan | Published (ppb) | Tested (ppb) | Unspecified | $0.65/gas of 2026-06 | 2026-06-24 | Details → |
| Milia Matcha | Tier 1 | Japan | Published (ppb) | Tested (ppb) | Unspecified | $0.80/gas of 2026-06 | 2026-06-21 | Details → |
| Teafy | Tier 1 | Kyoto Uji + Shizuoka, Japan | Published (ppb) | Tested (ppb) | EU | $0.70/gas of 2026-06 | 2026-06-21 | Details → |
Sorted by transparency tier (most transparent first) by default. All data sourced from brand websites and published COAs. How to read lab results →
How We Selected These Brands
Brands are included when their numeric lab results are publicly accessible on their website without any friction (no purchase, account, or request required). Public accessibility is verified by visiting brand websites at the time of last verification. We verify that results include numeric values, not just summary statements.
Data source
Brand websites, published COAs, independent test results
Verification method
Manual review of brand websites at last verified date
Last updated
2026-06-24
Limitations
Brand information can change. Verify current status before purchasing.
About This Collection
Why Public Lab Results Matter
A COA shared only on request is fundamentally different from a publicly accessible COA. When results are public, anyone can verify them independently — journalists, researchers, consumer advocates, and competing brands. When results are available only on request, the brand controls who sees them and can selectively share favorable results. Public accessibility is a meaningful transparency signal.
What 'Public' Means in This Context
For this collection, 'public' means the lab results are accessible on the brand's website without requiring a purchase, account creation, email request, or any other friction. The results should be findable by a search engine and accessible to anyone with the URL. Results that require a login or direct request do not qualify.
Numeric Results vs. Summary Statements
A public lab result should include actual numeric values — not just a statement that the product 'passed testing' or 'meets safety standards.' Numeric values allow independent comparison against regulatory limits and against other brands. Summary statements without numbers cannot be independently verified.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why would a brand not publish lab results publicly?
Brands may not publish results publicly for several reasons: results may be unfavorable, they may not want competitors to see their data, they may use testing as a sales tool (share on request to capture leads), or they may simply not prioritize transparency. The absence of public results is not proof of unsafe products — but it does prevent independent verification.
Are public lab results always accurate?
Public lab results from accredited laboratories are generally reliable, but they represent a specific batch at a specific point in time. Heavy metal levels can vary between batches. A COA from two years ago may not reflect current product. Always check the test date and batch information alongside the numeric results.
What is the difference between a numeric COA and a 'passed testing' statement?
A numeric COA shows actual measured values (e.g., lead: 45 ppb). A 'passed testing' statement only tells you the product met some threshold — without telling you what the threshold was or what the actual measured value was. Numeric results allow independent comparison; summary statements do not.
How do I find a brand's public lab results?
Look for a 'Lab Results,' 'COA,' 'Testing,' or 'Transparency' page on the brand's website. Some brands link to lab results from their product pages. If you can't find results after a reasonable search, the brand likely does not publish them publicly — even if they claim to test.
Data Freshness
Brand information — including testing status, organic certification, pricing, and origin claims — can change at any time. We verify data from brand websites at the dates shown in the table above.
Last updated: 2026-06-24 · Data sources: Brand websites, published COAs, independent test results · View full brand directory →
Related Collections
Explore more