High Transparency Matcha Brands
Tier 1 and Tier 2 matcha brands — publish some form of lab results or COA data publicly.
Quick Answer
Why these brands qualify
Each brand in this collection is rated Tier 1 or Tier 2 in our transparency system: they publish some form of COA or lab result data publicly. Tier assignment is verified from brand websites at the time of last verification.
Useful for
Buyers who want brands that publish some form of lab data, those comparing transparency levels across the industry, and anyone who wants more than just a testing claim without published results.
Strongest in collection
Teafy — Publishes numeric COA (ppb resolution, named lab, dated)
Collection Overview
Aggregate data across all 8 brands in this collection.
8
Brands in collection
6 of 8
With published COA
4 of 8
With numeric ppb testing
4 of 8
Organic certified
Tier 1.4
Avg transparency tier
$0.72/g
Avg price per gram
Key Takeaways
- 1High transparency brands are Tier 1 or Tier 2 — they publish some form of lab results publicly.
- 2Tier 1 publishes numeric ppb results; Tier 2 publishes ppm-only or non-detect results.
- 3ppm is 1,000x coarser than ppb — Tier 2 data is less informative but better than nothing.
- 4Both tiers are meaningfully more transparent than brands that claim testing without publishing data.
- 5Transparency tier reflects disclosure practices — always compare actual published numbers against regulatory limits.
Featured Brands
Strongest brands in this collection based on transparency and disclosure practices.
Kyoto Uji + Shizuoka, Japan · ceremonial grade
Publishes numeric COA (ppb resolution, named lab, dated)
Japan · ceremonial grade
Publishes numeric COA (ppb resolution, named lab, dated)
Japan · ceremonial grade
Publishes numeric COA (ppb resolution, named lab, dated)
Full Comparison Table
All 8 brands in this collection. Click column headers to sort.
| Brand ↕ | Transparency ↑ | Origin ↕ | COA Status | Heavy Metals | Organic | Price/g ↕ | Verified ↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan Johnson Blueprint | Tier 1 | Japan | Published (ppb) | Tested (ppb) | Unspecified | $1.10/gas of 2026-06 | 2026-06-21 | Details → |
| Matcha Nude | Tier 1 | Japan | Published (ppb) | Tested (ppb) | Unspecified | $0.65/gas of 2026-06 | 2026-06-24 | Details → |
| Milia Matcha | Tier 1 | Japan | Published (ppb) | Tested (ppb) | Unspecified | $0.80/gas of 2026-06 | 2026-06-21 | Details → |
| Steady MatchaUs | Tier 1 | Uji, Japan | Publishing at launch | Publishing at launch | JAS | $0.89/gas of 2026-06 | 2026-06-22 | Details → |
| Teafy | Tier 1 | Kyoto Uji + Shizuoka, Japan | Published (ppb) | Tested (ppb) | EU | $0.70/gas of 2026-06 | 2026-06-21 | Details → |
| Jade Leaf | Tier 2 | Kagoshima and Uji, Japan | Claims testing | Claimed | USDA | $0.45/gas of 2026-06 | 2026-06-21 | Details → |
| Midori Spring | Tier 2 | Japan | Published | Tested (ppm) | USDA | $0.60/gas of 2026-06 | 2026-06-24 | Details → |
| Ocha & Co | Tier 2 | Japan | Published | Tested (ppm) | Unspecified | $0.55/gas of 2026-06 | 2026-06-24 | Details → |
Sorted by transparency tier (most transparent first) by default. All data sourced from brand websites and published COAs. How to read lab results →
How We Selected These Brands
Brands are classified as Tier 1 or Tier 2 based on their published lab data. Tier 1 requires numeric ppb results, a named lab, and a test date. Tier 2 requires published ppm-only or non-detect results. Tier assignment is verified by visiting brand websites at the time of last verification.
Data source
Brand websites, published COAs, independent test results
Verification method
Manual review of brand websites at last verified date
Last updated
2026-06-24
Limitations
Brand information can change. Verify current status before purchasing.
About This Collection
Tier 1 vs. Tier 2 Transparency
Tier 1 brands publish numeric heavy metal results at ppb resolution with a named lab and test date — the gold standard. Tier 2 brands publish ppm-only results or non-detect results without ppb resolution. Both tiers are meaningfully more transparent than Tier 3 (claims testing, no public numbers) and Tier 4 (no public testing statement). The difference between Tier 1 and Tier 2 is the precision of the published data.
Why ppm-Only Results Are Less Informative
Parts per million (ppm) is 1,000 times coarser than parts per billion (ppb). A ppm non-detect result cannot rule out contamination at the ppb level. For example, a non-detect at 1 ppm means the lab couldn't detect lead above 1,000 ppb — which is well above California Prop 65 thresholds. ppm-only results are better than nothing, but they provide much less information than ppb-resolution data.
The Value of Any Published Data
Even Tier 2 transparency — ppm-only or non-detect results — is meaningfully better than no published data. It demonstrates that the brand has engaged with third-party testing and is willing to share some results publicly. Brands that publish any lab data are more accountable than brands that make testing claims without any public evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Tier 1 and Tier 2 transparency?
Tier 1 brands publish numeric heavy metal results at ppb resolution with a named lab and test date. Tier 2 brands publish ppm-only results or non-detect results without ppb resolution. The key difference is precision: ppb is 1,000x more precise than ppm. Tier 1 data allows direct comparison against regulatory limits; Tier 2 data is less informative but still better than no published data.
Should I only buy from Tier 1 brands?
Tier 1 transparency is the gold standard, but Tier 2 brands are also meaningfully transparent. If a Tier 2 brand's ppm-only results show non-detect at a reasonable detection limit, that's useful information. The key is to understand what the published data does and doesn't tell you. Tier 3 and Tier 4 brands — which publish no data — are the ones to approach with the most caution.
How many matcha brands are Tier 1 or Tier 2?
In our current database, a minority of brands achieve Tier 1 or Tier 2 transparency. Most brands either claim testing without publishing results (Tier 3) or have no public testing statement (Tier 4). The brands in this collection represent the more transparent segment of the matcha market.
Can a brand move from Tier 2 to Tier 1?
Yes. A brand can improve its transparency tier by publishing more detailed lab results. Moving from Tier 2 to Tier 1 requires publishing numeric ppb results (not just ppm or non-detect) with a named lab and test date. We update tier assignments when brands publish new data.
Data Freshness
Brand information — including testing status, organic certification, pricing, and origin claims — can change at any time. We verify data from brand websites at the dates shown in the table above.
Last updated: 2026-06-24 · Data sources: Brand websites, published COAs, independent test results · View full brand directory →
Related Collections
Explore more